Cases 1 - 10 of 13
PINKSTON v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al

as 2:2019cv13285
Defendant:
OFFICER PHILLIP ZACCHE, OFFICER ROES 1-10, SGT. J. RANSOM
and others
Plaintiff:
LEO PINKSTON
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
FRATIS v. PHH CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv09674
Plaintiff:
TAMI FRATIS
Defendant:
PHH CORPORATION, JAMES O. EGAN, JANE D. CARLIN
and others
Cause Of Action: m(a) Securities Exchange Act
FRANCHI v. PHH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv09006
Plaintiff:
ADAM FRANCHI
Defendant:
PHH CORPORATION, JANE D. CARLIN, ROBERT B. CROWL
and others
Cause Of Action: m(a) Securities Exchange Act
SHAEV v. PHH CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv08847
Plaintiff:
DAVID SHAEV
Defendant:
PHH CORPORATION, JAMES O. EGAN, JANE D. CARLIN
and others
Cause Of Action: m(a) Securities Exchange Act
SMITH v. PHH CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv08396
Plaintiff:
GREG SMITH
Defendant:
PHH CORPORATION, JAMES O. EGAN, JANE D. CARLIN
and others
Cause Of Action: m(a) Securities Exchange Act
LEI v. PHH CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv07934
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEI
Defendant:
PHH CORPORATION, JANE D. CARLIN, ROBERT B. CROWL
and others
Cause Of Action: m(a) Securities Exchange Act
FALOTICO v. ALLAMUCHY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 3:2017cv05485
Plaintiff:
MARILYN FALOTICO
Defendant:
ALLAMUCHY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, DONNA TRAINELLO, DIANE CLARK
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
BAYONNE MUSLIMS et al v. CITY OF BAYONNE et al
as 2:2017cv03731
Plaintiff:
BAYONNE MUSLIMS , ABDUL HAMEED BUTT , KHALED ALY
Defendant:
CITY OF BAYONNE , CITY OF BAYONNE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT , MARK URBAN
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
KATES v. CHRISTIE et al

as 2:2014cv05769
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.