Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kopecky v. RJM Investments et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv04921
Plaintiff: James L. Kopecky
Defendant: RJM Investments, Jon Withey, Mark Vehslage and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kopecky et al v. Vehslage et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv03135
Plaintiff: James L. Kopecky
Defendant: Mark Vehslage, Heather Lengyel and Richard Schripsema
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Kopecky v. Crowe
as 1:2007cv07178
Plaintiff: James L Kopecky
Defendant: Philip Crowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kopecky et al v. Bandyk et al
as 1:2007cv07156
Plaintiff: James L Kopecky
Defendant: Thomas Bandyk, Bandyk & Associates and Bandyk & Associates, Sole Proprietor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Kopecky v. Lakewood Properties, LTD.
as 1:2007cv02863
Plaintiff: James L Kopecky
Defendant: Lakewood Properties, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Kopecky v. Corby et al
as 1:2007cv02865
Plaintiff: James L Kopecky
Defendant: Daniel C. Corby, Jr., Harley H. Hoppe, Edward Teague and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Kopecky v. King
as 1:2007cv02862
Plaintiff: James L Kopecky
Defendant: Jennifer King
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Kopecky v. Wirick et al
as 1:2007cv01913
Plaintiff: James L Kopecky
Defendant: Matthew Wirick, Matthew Wirick, Wirick & Associates, DDS P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kopecky v. Regopoulos et al
as 1:2007cv01914
Plaintiff: James L Kopecky
Defendant: Efstathious Regopoulos and Rego Group, Ltd, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kopecky v. Hamet et al
as 1:2007cv01919
Plaintiff: James L Kopecky
Defendant: Kenneth Hamet and Darlene Hamet
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?