Cases 31 - 40 of 115
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Omar v. Texas Service Center et al
as 1:2021cv01857
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, ABC Agency 1-10, US Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Petitioner:
FARUQUE OMAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Barber v. United States of America et. al.
as 2:2021cv01664
Plaintiff:
Nova Barber
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, John and Jane Does 1-10, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr
Nur v. Texas Service Center et al
as 1:2021cv01518
Respondent:
Attorney General Merrick Garland, ABC Agency 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Petitioner:
Mohammad Nur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rasel et al v. Texas Service Center et al
as 1:2021cv01332
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, ABC Agency 1-10, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Petitioner:
Nour Mohammad Rasel and Afroza Akter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01149
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Zaks v. Zaks
as 7:2021cv01771
Defendant:
JOHN 1-10 DOES, JANE DOES 1-10, Rabbi Aryeh Zaks and others
Plaintiff:
Henoch Zaks
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Zhang et al v. Han et al
as 1:2021cv01625
Defendant:
Junjun Feng, Hanfor (Cayman) Limited, BZ Industrial (China) and others
Plaintiff:
Wei Fan, Jun Zhou, Minglian Zhang and others
Amin v. Renaud et al
as 1:2021cv00818
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, ABC Agency 1-10, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
JAYDUL AMIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
