Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Luhm v. Prosource Produce, LLC
as 1:2021cv00476
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Luhm
Defendant:
Prosource Produce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teresa Drake et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00051
Plaintiff:
Melissa Gassaway, Aracely Parra, Teresa Drake and others
Defendant:
Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, Mentor Worldwide, LLC, Does 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sahli et al v. Larry H. Miller Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00325
Plaintiff:
Jennifer G. Sahli and Roger E. Sahli
Defendant:
Larry H. Miller Corporation , Scott Brewer , Eric Sommerfeld and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joiner et al v. Allen et al
as 4:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Joiner and Jennifer Joiner
Defendant:
Michelle Allen , Public Health District #6 and State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edwards v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Brian Edwards
Defendant:
United States Postal Service , Jennifer Fairchild and I - X DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Karbusheva et al v. Mendoza et al
as 1:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Elena B Karbusheva
Defendant:
Philip Mendoza, St Alphonsus, St Alphonsus Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Chace v. Root et al
as 1:2011cv00172
Plaintiff:
Raymond N Chace, Jr
Defendant:
Brian A Root, Jennifer R Root, Michael J Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Webber et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jason Webber and Jennifer Webber
Defendant:
United States of America and Saint Alphonsus Medical Center - Nampa, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Moran v. Potter et al
as 2:2010cv00056
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Moran
Defendant:
Roy L. Potter, Roy L. Potter, Pittman Trucking, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
