Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Howarth v. Audioholics, L.L.C. et al
as 8:2026cv00293
Plaintiff:
Morgan Howarth
Defendant:
Audioholics, L.L.C. and Gene DellaSala
Pretrial Service:
Jim Matulis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Alliance Workforce Solutions, LLC v. Callan et al
as 8:2025cv02772
Plaintiff:
Alliance Workforce Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Dustin Callan, Katie Callan and Bay to Bay Staffing, LLC
Pretrial Service:
Jim Matulis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Morgan Global, PLLC v. Croskey Law, PLLC
as 3:2025cv00491
Plaintiff:
Morgan Global, PLLC
Defendant:
Croskey Law, PLLC
Pretrial Service:
Jim Matulis
Counter-Claimant:
Croskey Law, PLLC
Counter-Defendant:
Morgan Global, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2025cv00691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pretrial Service:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
EOS Fitness OPCO Holdings LLC v. Divine Iron Holdings LLC
as 8:2025cv00930
Plaintiff:
EOS Fitness OPCO Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Divine Iron Holdings LLC doing business as Divine Iron Gym
Pretrial Service:
Jim Matulis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0044 Trademark Infringement
Chanel, Inc. v. L., Inc. et al
as 8:2025cv00635
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
L., Inc., L. Spa556, LLC and Leeanne Swor
Pretrial Service:
Jim Matulis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Castro et al v. Nieves et al
as 6:2025cv00391
Defendant:
Humberto Nieves, TITO NIEVES, LOUD AND LIVE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Castro doing business as MI CONJUNTO PUBLISHING and RC ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Pretrial Service:
Jim Matulis
Counter-Claimant:
Humberto Nieves
Counter-Defendant:
Ramon Castro doing business as Mi Conjunto Records and RC ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
