Cases 1 - 7 of 7
KLIVINGTON v. DEPARTMENT OF AIR FORCE et al
as 1:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
DIANE KLIVINGTON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF AIR FORCE, DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
GEBERT v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2022cv02939
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW GEBERT
Not Classified By Court:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, BRUCE COLE, JEANNE M JULIA and others
Defendant:
JEANNE M. JULIAO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
STIRRUP v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2021cv01893
Plaintiff:
HEIDI STIRRUP, MARK EDWARD GREEN, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, GENERAL LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
POLIDI v. MENDEL et al
as 1:2021cv01748
Plaintiff:
RICHARD POLIDI
Defendant:
ELIZABETH U. MENDEL, KIMBERLY C. WEINREICH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
DOE et al v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2017cv02694
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, 1 and JOHN DOE, 2
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Movant:
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON and ANNE L. WEISMANN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
DOE 1 et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2017cv02005
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 1 , JANE DOE 2 , JOHN DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
UNITED AUBURN INDIAN COMMUNITY OF THE AUBURN RANCHERIA v. SALAZAR et al
as 1:2012cv01988
Plaintiff:
UNITED AUBURN INDIAN COMMUNITY OF THE AUBURN RANCHERIA , CITIZENS FOR A BETTER WAY , STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA! and others
Defendant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR , KEVIN K. WASHBURN , BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
