Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Ardagna v. Nationwide Tax Experts, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04559
Plaintiff: Nicholas Ardagna
Defendant: Nationwide Tax Experts, Inc. d/b/a National Tax Experts, Inc., John Doe Corporations 1 Through 10 and Nationwide Tax Experts, Inc. doing business as National Tax Experts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Rodriguez-Jaquez et al
as 1:2022cv04247
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Carlos Rafael Rodriguez-Jaquez, M.D., Carlos Rodriguez-Jaquez, M.D. (A Sole Proprietorship), John Doe Defendants "1" through "10" and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Kalitenko et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03804
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Sergey Kalitenko, MD, Sergey Kalitenko, M.D. (A Sole Proprietorship), Sergey A. Kalitenko Physician, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Kenworthy et al
as 1:2022cv03728
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Eric Kenworthy, MD, Eric Kenworthy MD (A Sole Proprietorship), Eric Kenworthy (A Sole Proprietorship) and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2022cv03475
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Denny Xavier Rodriguez, M.D., DXR Medical Service, P.C., John Doe Defendants "1" through "10" and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Vine et al
as 1:2022cv02965
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Mark H Vine, M.D., Mark H Vine MD doing business as Mark Vine MD (A Sole Proprietorship), Yana Marinovich and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Karin Gepp, Ph.D. (A Sole Proprietorship) et al
as 1:2022cv02860
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Karin Gepp, Ph.D. (A Sole Proprietorship), Gepp Psychological Services, PLLC, Karin Gepp and others
Petitioner: Law Office of Eitan Dagan P.C.
Respondent: Vladislav Stoyanovsky
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Time to Care Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02158
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Time to Care Pharmacy, Inc., Michael Tabulov and John Doe Nos. "1' through "10"
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Jiankang Leasing Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01484
Defendant: Maxym Fesler, Jiankang Leasing Inc., Maksym Fesler and others
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Masood et al
as 1:2022cv01215
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Faisal Masood, D.C., Masood Chiropractic Diagnostic, P.C., Gentle Touch Chiropractic Care PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?