Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND et al v. FULFAB, INC.
as 1:2008cv00616
Plaintiff: NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND, JOHN KERR, ANTHONY WALENCIK and others
Defendant: FULFAB, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND et al v. STEEL SERVICE PLUS, LTD., et al
as 1:2008cv00545
Plaintiff: NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND, JOHN KERR, ANTHONY WALENCIK and others
Defendant: STEEL SERVICE PLUS, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND et al v. NEWARK WIRE WORKS, INC.
as 1:2008cv00430
Plaintiff: NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND, JOHN KERR, ANTHONY WALENCIK and others
Defendant: NEWARK WIRE WORKS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND et al v. COLUMBIA IRON WORKS, INC.
as 1:2008cv00224
Plaintiff: NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND, JOHN KERR, ANTHONY WALENCIK and others
Defendant: COLUMBIA IRON WORKS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND et al v. GEORG FISCHER DISA, INC.
as 1:2008cv00132
Plaintiff: NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND, JOHN KERR, ANTHONY WALENCIK and others
Defendant: GEORG FISCHER DISA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND et al v. DELHI STEEL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv02126
Plaintiff: NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND, JOHN KERR, ANTHONY WALENCIK and others
Defendant: DELHI STEEL CORPORATION and EUGENE KARL KEPPLER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND et al v. RUSCO STEEL COMPANY et al
as 1:2007cv00110
Plaintiff: NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND, JOHN KERR, ANTHONY WALENCIK and others
Defendant: RUSCO STEEL COMPANY, RUSCO STEEL FABRICATION COMPANY, RUSSELL INVESTMENTS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?