Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Demos v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2279
Petitioner: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DONALD J. TRUMP
Demos v. Bayer, et al.
as 24-828
Plaintiff: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant: DANIEL BAYER, Shift Lt, WSP, JENNIFER ADAMS, P.R.E.A. Liason, WSP, M. MORENO, Major Hearings Officer, WSP and others
Demos v. State of Washington
as 24-676
Petitioner / Appellant: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent / Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Demos v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-680
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Defendant / Appellee: CHERYL STRANGE, ROBERT FERGUSON, BRAD BOWMAN and others
Demos v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-414
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS and Abner Edras Maiominides
Defendant / Appellee: WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHERYL STRANGE, ROBERT JACKSON, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary and others
Demos v. Haynes
as 23-3990
Petitioner: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Respondent: RON HAYNES
John Demos, Jr. v. USDC-WAWSE
as 23-70132
Not Classified By Court: In re: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr., DANIEL BAYER, Shift Lt, WSP, JENNIFER ADAMS, P.R.E.A. Liason, WSP and others
Petitioner: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Demos v. Pierce, et al.
as 23-1366
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: GARY PIERCE, Major Hearings Disciplinary Officer, JENNIFER ADAMS, WSP P.R.E.A. Liaison, B ROHAN, Washington State Penitentiary Shift Lieutenant and others
Demos v. District of Columbia, et al.
as 23-1361
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE VIRGINIA CORPORATION, WASHINGTON DC and others
Demos v. Holbrook
as 23-1000
Petitioner: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent: DONALD HOLBROOK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?