Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge
and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Mora-Contreras et al v. Peters et al
as 6:2018cv00678
Defendant:
John Does, Zachary Gould, Meghan Leddy
and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Mora-Contreras, Shane Staggs
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann et al v. Donald et al
as 7:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
Astaniel Jarvis Mann, Pip Heng, Elijah Adcock
and others
Defendant:
James Donald, Rick Jacobs, Sarah Draper
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Cassady et al
as 2:2015cv04199
Plaintiff:
Vincent X Lee
Defendant:
Jay Cassady, Bill Armontrout, Donald Wyrick
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jim Housley v. Mary Jane Erwin, et al
as 08-1732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jim L. Housley
Defendant - Appellee:
Mary Jane Erwin, Mayor of the City of Flippin, Arkansas, The City of Flippin, Arkansas, John Doe Police Officers, Flippin, Arkansas
and others
Cornelius Yancey, IV v. James Farrior
as 08-8346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELIUS E. YANCEY, IV
Party-in-Interest - None:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES FARRIOR, LIEUTENANT SMITH, JOHN DOE, 6
Housley v. Erwin et al
as 3:2007cv03054
Defendant:
John Does, Tom Fleming, Shane Lane
and others
Plaintiff:
Jim L Housley
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael J. Fegans v. Larry Norris, et al
as 06-3473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael J. Fegans
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity, Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit of the Arkansas Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacities, John Lowe, Assistant Warden, in his individual and official capacities
and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
