Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson et al v. United States et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00679
Plaintiff: Jeffrey L.G. Johnson, Jerry Arnaz Johnson, Joseph Johnson
Defendant: City of St. Louis, James A. Pudlowski, United States Court of Appeals Federal Circuit and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Street et al v. O'Toole et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv02590
Defendant: Jeremiah Koerper, Jeffrey Long, Nick Henderson and others
Plaintiff: Fudail McCain, Ashley Theis, Ronald Harris and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Pitchford v. Boeckmann et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00118
Plaintiff: Frederick L Pitchford
Defendant: Joseph Boeckmann, Fred Thorne, David Henry Lofton and others
Cause Of Action: Other Civil Rights
Young v. Miller et al
as 4:2016cv00653
Plaintiff: Timothy E Young
Defendant: Donna R Miller, Craig S Shannon, Jaclyn M Zimmerman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Green et al v. City of St. Louis Missouri We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv01433
Defendant: City of St. Louis, Missouri
Plaintiff: Percy Green, III , Abram Pruitt, Jr. , Harrith RT Ahmad and others
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Race)
Banks et al v. New York Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv03012
Defendant: Ronnie Abrams, Jessica Albert, Harold Baer and others
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks, Kenneth Posner
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jeffers et al v. Beebe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00016
Plaintiff: Future Mae Jeffers , Mary Jeffers , Henry Peacock and others
Defendant: Mike Beebe , Mark Martin , Dustin McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: Voting Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Henry Siems v. City of Minneapolis, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1456
Plaintiff - Appellant: Henry Kenneth Roger Siems, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: City of Minneapolis, a municipal corporation in Minnesota, Officer Joseph Adams, individually and in his official capacity, Officer Hien Dinh, individually and in his official capacity and others
Chris Lowry, et al v. Watson Chapel School District, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1139
Plaintiff - Appellee: Chris Lowry, by, through, and with his Mother, Wendy Crow, Colton Dougan, by, through, and with his Father, Frank Dougan and his Mother, Leigh Dougan, Micheal Joseph, by, through, and with his Mother Heidi Joseph and others
Defendant - Appellant: Watson Chapel School District, Charles Daniel Knight, Watson Chapel School District Superintendent, in his individual and official capacities, Henry Webb, in his individual and offical capacities as Principal of Watson Chapel Junior High
Defendant: Charles Daniels, Watson Chapel School Board President, Sandra C. Boone, Vice President, in her individual capacity, Donnie Hartsfield, Secretary, in his individual capacity and others
Chris Lowry, et al v. Watson Chapel School District, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-3437
Plaintiff - Appellee: Chris Lowry, by, through, and with his Mother, Wendy Crow, Colton Dougan, by, through, and with his Father, Frank Dougan and his Mother, Leigh Dougan, Micheal Joseph, by, through, and with his Mother Heidi Joseph and others
Defendant - Appellant: Watson Chapel School District, Charles Daniel Knight, Watson Chapel School District Superintendent, in his individual and official capacities, Henry Webb, in his individual and offical capacities as Principal of Watson Chapel Junior High
Defendant: Charles Daniels, Watson Chapel School Board President, Sandra C. Boone, Vice President, in her individual capacity, Donnie Hartsfield, Secretary, in his individual capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?