Cases 1 - 10 of 333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02722
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al
as 1:2024cv02618
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, JULIE SU, JESSICA LOOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02624
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SCHMIDT v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv02626
Defendant:
RENA BITTER, ANTONY BLINKEN, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREAS HANS-GEORG SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
NOBLE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al
as 1:2024cv02307
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and JULIE A. SU
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. NOBLE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02131
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MOORE v. MOORE et al
as 1:2024cv01814
Defendant:
HILLARY DAVIS, JOHN DOES 1-10, JULIE SANFORD and others
Plaintiff:
MAHTAUB MOORE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01848
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
