Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Nathan Byerly v. State of Idaho, et al
as 20-35085
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH YORDY, Warden, ADA COUNTY, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHAN B. BYERLY
Gary Merchant v. Corizon Health, Inc., et al
as 19-36093
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, LLC, DAVID AGLER, M.D. and JOHN MIGLIORI, M.D.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY L. MERCHANT
Defendant:
KEITH YORDY, Warden, DOES, John/Jane I-X; Whose true identities are presently unknown, CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and others
Michael Russo v. Keith Yordy
as 19-35632
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH YORDY, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL ROWE RUSSO
Nicholas Johnson v. Keith Yordy
as 19-35597
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH YORDY, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS DAVID JOHNSON
Glen Ward v. IDOC, et al
as 19-35587
Defendant / Appellee:
IDOC, DYLAN ARTEAGA, J. KELLER, #9348 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN JONES WARD
Shane Crawford v. Keith Yordy
as 19-35481
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH YORDY, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHANE CRAWFORD
Faron Hawkins v. Gary Raney, et al
as 19-35325
Petitioner / Appellant:
FARON RAYMOND HAWKINS
Respondent:
RANDY BLADES, Warden, KEITH YORDY, Warden, ROGER BOURNE, Ada County Prosecutor and others
Respondent / Appellee:
JAY CHRISTENSEN, Custodian and GARY RANEY, Ada County Sheriff
Joshua McGiboney v. Keith Yordy
as 19-35327
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH YORDY, Warden, Idaho State Correctional Institution
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSHUA LEE MCGIBONEY
Bradley Vanzant v. Keith Yordy
as 19-35232
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRADLEY JOSEPH VANZANT
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH YORDY, Warden
Brian Hogue v. Keith Yordy, et al
as 19-35086
Defendant:
DANIEL BARRY, CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, JANE DOE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH YORDY, Warden, Warden of ISCI, TERRIE ROSENTHAL and IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN E. HOGUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
