Cases 1 - 4 of 4
James Loyd, et al v. Huntington National Bank, et al
as 09-3879
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as corporate successor to Bank of Boston, U.S. BANK, as successsor by merger to Firstar Bank, N.A.; Star Bank, N.A., GERMAN AMERICAN BANCORP, as corporate successor to Community Trust and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LOYD
Plaintiff:
ANNA UEBEL, HARLAM WARREN, JOSEPH VANEK and others
James Loyd, et al v. Huntington National Bank, et al
as 09-3879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LOYD
Plaintiff:
HORST UEBEL, ANNA UEBEL, JOSEPH VANEK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, itself and as corporate successor by merger to First National Bank of Zanesville; County Savings Bank and Unizan Bank, FIFTH THIRD BANK, itself and as corporate successor by merger to Citizens Bank and Strongsville Savings Bank, SUNTRUST BANK, N.A. and others
Carol Metz, et al v. Unizan Bank, et al
as 09-3751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL METZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIZAN BANK, itself and as corporate successor by merger of FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ZANESVILLE and COUNTY SAVINGS BANK, FIFTH THIRD BANK, itself and as corporate successor by merger of STRONGSVILLE SAVINGS BANK, WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., itself and as corporate successor by merger of FIRST UNITED BANK; FIRST UNITED BANCORP; FIRST UNION and others
Carol Metz, et al v. Unizan Bank, et al
as 09-3751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROL METZ, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, et al.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIZAN BANK, itself and as corporate successor by merger of FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ZANESVILLE and COUNTY SAVINGS BANK, FIFTH THIRD BANK, itself and as corporate successor by merger of STRONGSVILLE SAVINGS BANK, WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., itself and as corporate successor by merger of FIRST UNITED BANK; FIRST UNITED BANCORP; FIRST UNION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
