Real Property Cases filed in New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
The Secretary of the U.S. Department Housing and Urban Development v. Kings County Public Administrator et al
as 1:2024cv02683
Plaintiff: The Secretary of the U.S. Department Housing and Urban Development an agency of the United States of America
Defendant: Kings County Public Administrator, as Administrator of the Estate of Mona Fish, deceased, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, Jude Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1703 Default of HUD Loan
King et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2024cv01153
Plaintiff: Cecil Roy King and Valerie Hunter King
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association, Pricilla Almodovar, PHH Mortgage Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Coleman et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv08089
Plaintiff: Alice M. Coleman, Anne Cooney-Hartmann, Tamara Gregorian and others
Defendant: Northrop Grumman Corporation and Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Young et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2023cv07160
Plaintiff: Rory Young, Ashley Palmer, Chris Plummer and others
Defendant: 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Kalogeras v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv04707
Plaintiff: Helen Kalogeras
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., CVS Pharamacy Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brooklyn Park Slope Fitness LLC et al v. Manischevitz Family LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02628
Plaintiff: Brooklyn Park Slope Fitness LLC and Back On Track Consulting, Inc.
Defendant: MANISCHEVITZ FAMILY LLC, 12TH STREET ASSOCS. A LLC, 12TH STREET ASSOCS. B LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Kings County Public Administrator, as Administrator of the Estate of Dolores Sartori, deceased et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07925
Plaintiff: THE SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, an agency of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Defendant: Kings County Public Administrator, as Administrator of the Estate of Dolores Sartori, deceased, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, New York City Environmental Control Board; and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1703 Default of HUD Loan
The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Kings County Public Administrator et al
as 1:2022cv07052
Plaintiff: THE SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, an agency of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Defendant: Kings County Public Administrator, as Administrator of the Estate of Dolores Sartori, deceased, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, United States of America o/b/o Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Templeton et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2022cv09631
Plaintiff: Jerry W. Templeton, Dennis Higgins, George Nunnery and others
Defendant: 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Burrow et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv00465
Plaintiff: Eddie Burrow, Carl Frazier, Raymond Gilbert and others
Defendant: 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?