Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Patel v. United States District Court for the District of Montana, Helena
as 24-635
Petitioner:
RAJ K. PATEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, HELENA
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS and others
Patel v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, United States President, ALL CABINET OFFICERS and others
Scott v. Harris
as 23-3881
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GENE EDWARD SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
KAMALA HARRIS
Unico Mechanical Corp., et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 17-15094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNICO MECHANICAL CORP., a California corporation and ALFRED CONHAGEN, INC. OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General for the State of California, CHRISTINE BAKER, in her official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations, DIANE RAVNIK, in her official capacity as the Chief of the California Division of Apprenticeship Standards and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
STATE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, AFL-CIO
Thomas More Law Center v. Kamala Harri
as 16-56902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA HARRIS, in her Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Thomas More Law Center v. Kamala Harris
as 16-56855
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER
Defendant - Appellant:
KAMALA HARRIS, in her Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Nina Ringgold, et al v. USDC-CALA
as 14-72345
:
In re: NINA RINGGOLD, ALI TAZHIBI and ASAP COPY AND PRINT
Petitioner:
NINA RINGGOLD, ALI TAZHIBI, DBA ASAP Copy and Print and ASAP COPY AND PRINT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and others
In re: Nathalee Evans, et al v. USDC-CALA
as 14-71956
:
In re: NATHALEE EVANS and DORIAN CARTER
Petitioner:
NATHALEE EVANS and DORIAN CARTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
JERRY BROWN, in his individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California et al., KAMALA HARRIS, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
ASAP Copy and Print, et al v. USDC-CALA
as 14-71589
:
In re: ASAP COPY AND PRINT, ALI TAZHIBI and NINA RINGGOLD
Petitioner:
ASAP COPY AND PRINT, ALI TAZHIBI, DBA ASAP Copy and Print and NINA RINGGOLD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and others
Chinatown Neighborhood Associa, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 14-15781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, a nonprofit corporation and ASIAN AMERICANS FOR POLITICAL ADVANCEMENT, a political action committee
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of the State of California and CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director, California Department of Fish and Game
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION and ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN OCEAN HARMONY ALLIANCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
