Cases 1 - 10 of 23
CORRIDEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06709
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAM CORRIDEN, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv14485
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THORNE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13344
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAM THORNE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCHRADER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12099
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAM SCHRADER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50557
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAM LANE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50026
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAM MORGAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORRIDEN II v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40591
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAM CORRIDEN II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05926
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAMS JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05986
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAM JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SELLINGER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv18254
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAM SELLINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
