Cases 11 - 20 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DAUD et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv01959
Plaintiff:
SUMMIYA DAUD and MUHAMMAD ZAKARIA KHAN
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, DONALD BLOME and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
KHAN v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv01025
Plaintiff:
HAJIRA KHAN
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ANDREW SCHOFER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
AFINITI, LTD. et al v. CHISHTI et al
as 1:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
AFINITI, LTD. and AFINITI, INC.
Defendant:
MUHAMMAD ZIAULLAH KHAN CHISHTI, QINHE (HAINAN) INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY LTD., ISBEI LTD. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03830
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
