Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 23-70089
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK and STATE OF IDAHO
Petitioner:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 23-70084
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK and STATE OF IDAHO
Petitioner:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 23-70083
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK and STATE OF IDAHO
Petitioner:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 23-70080
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK and STATE OF IDAHO
Petitioner:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 23-70082
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK and STATE OF IDAHO
Petitioner:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 23-70079
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK and STATE OF IDAHO
Petitioner:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 23-70081
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK and STATE OF IDAHO
Petitioner:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 23-70070
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK, B. LYNN WINMILL, Judge, DAVID C. NYE, Judge and others
Petitioner:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Lacey Sivak v. USDC-IDB
as 23-70064
Not Classified By Court:
In re: LACEY MARK SIVAK and JAY CHRISTENSEN, Warden
Petitioner:
LACEY MARK SIVAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
