Cases 21 - 30 of 144
Johnson v. BTRS Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01508
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
BTRS Holdings Inc., Flint Lane, Robert Farrell and others
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Openeye US Inc.
as 1:2022cv01505
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Openeye US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Openpath Security Inc.
as 1:2022cv01497
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Openpath Security Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Teal Drones, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Teal Drones, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Turing Video, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01402
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Turing Video, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Watts Innovations, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01404
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Watts Innovations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Security Camera Warehouse, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01414
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Security Camera Warehouse, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Skydio, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01408
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Skydio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Vantage Robotics, LLC
as 1:2022cv01406
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Vantage Robotics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Brinc Drones, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01409
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Brinc Drones, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
