Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Barbieri v. Legg Mason, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05231
Defendant:
Franklin Resources, Inc. d/b/a Franklin Templeton Investments, Legg Mason, Inc., Legg Mason & Co., LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Belinda Barbieri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
ABC v. DEF
as 1:2020cv04433
Defendant:
WCFS Inc., Pinnacle West Corp., MFO Management Company (Towle Fund) and others
Plaintiff:
ABC, Marc S. Kirschner and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rubin v. Legg Mason, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03355
Defendant:
Michelle J. Goldberg, John V. Murphy, Edward P. Garden and others
Plaintiff:
Michal Tamar Rubin
Gordon v. Legg Mason, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02941
Defendant:
Michelle J. Goldberg, Joseph A. Sullivan, Edward P. Garden and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Gordon
Minzer v. Legg Mason Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02910
Defendant:
Robert E. Angelica, Michelle J. Goldberg, Legg Mason Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Shoshana Minzer
Pimco Funds: Pimco Total Return Fund et al v. Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. et al
as 1:2015cv08192
Defendant:
Marcos Antonio Zacarias, Daniel Lima De Oliveira, Josue Christiano Gomes Da Silva and others
Plaintiff:
Pimco Total Return Collective Trust, Pimco Luxembourg Trust, CommoditiesPlus Strategy Fund, PIMCO Funds: Global Investors Series plc, Global Multi-Asset Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In the Matter of the Petition of Legg Mason Investment Counsel & Trust Company, N.A., to Perpetuate Testimony v. Hallingby
as 1:2011mc00062
Plaintiff:
Legg Mason Investment Counsel & Trust Company, N.A.
Defendant:
Jo Davis Hallingby
Cause Of Action: M 23 Petition to Perpetuate Testimony
Hallingby v. Legg Mason Investment Counsel & Trust Company, N.A.
as 1:2010cv07705
Plaintiff:
Jo Davis Hallingby
Defendant:
Legg Mason Investment Counsel & Trust Company, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
