Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Alvin Frazier v. Amy Coffelt, et al
as 21-1740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant / Appellee:
AMY COFFELT, Food Service Supervisor, KEVIN LINDSEY, Warden, D. SMITH, Deputy Warden and others
Kevin Myers v. Kevin Lindsey, et al
as 21-1081
Defendant / Appellee:
CINDY M. OLMSTEAD, President / CEO of the Michigan Braille Transcribing Fund, MARK HOLEY, Production Manager of the Michigan Braille Transcribing Fund, STACEY PURDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN JAMEL RASHARD MYERS
Sean Ryan v. G. Robert Cotton Correctional, et al
as 20-1537
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] COREY-STRIKER, Resident Unit Manager, [UNKNOWN] PATIZIKA, [UNKNOWN] KISOR, Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN MICHAEL RYAN
Sean Ryan v. G. Robert Cotton Correctional, et al
as 20-1305
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] COREY-STRIKER, Resident Unit Manager, [UNKNOWN] PATIZIKA, [UNKNOWN] KISOR, Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN MICHAEL RYAN
Alvin Frazier v. Kevin Lindsey, et al
as 19-2022
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD RUSSELL, Hearings Administrator, [UNKNOWN] JONES, Mental Health Service Case Manager Psychologist, R. DAVIDSON, TC, Unit Counselor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALVIN FRAZIER
Morris RogersIn re: Morris Rogers
as 19-1948
Respondent:
KEVIN LINDSEY, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: MORRIS PAUL ROGERS
Andrew Roush v. Kevin Lindsey
as 19-1623
Respondent / Appellee:
KEVIN LINDSEY, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW ROUSH
Brian Evans v. Kevin Lindsey
as 19-1394
Respondent / Appellee:
KEVIN LINDSEY, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN MATTHEW EVANS
Bryant Royster v. Kevin Lindsey
as 19-1304
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRYANT LAMONT ROYSTER
Respondent / Appellee:
KEVIN LINDSEY, Warden
Daniel Govind v. Fernando Gonzalez
as 09-70128
Petitioner:
DANIEL H. GOVIND
Respondent:
GARY LINDSEY, Warden and FERNANDO GONZALEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
