Cases 1 - 10 of 512
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Tung et al v. Blinken et al
as 1:2024cv02590
Plaintiff:
Crystal Tung and Jiayou Luo
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shaya v. Nofs et al
as 2:2024cv10670
Plaintiff:
Stephen B. Shaya
Defendant:
Kylie Nofs, Zhu Shicai, Luo Yanbing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Luo v. The Partnership and Unincorporated Organizations in Schedule A
as 8:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Yu Luo
Defendant:
The Partnership and Unincorporated Organizations in Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Luo v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Organizations in Schedule A
as 1:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
Yu Luo
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Organizations in Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Luo v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as FLM/8:24-CV-00615
Plaintiff:
Luo
Defendant:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Luo v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Organizations in Schedule A
as ILN/1:24-CV-01977
Plaintiff:
Luo
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Organizations in Schedule A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
