Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hooks vs Lopez-Rivero, et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Defendant:
Antonay Arnetta Hooks, Lyft, Inc. and Jose Luis Lopez-Rivero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
State of Nevada, Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation ex. rel. Chagolla v. Lyft, Inc.,
as 3:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
State of Nevada, Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation ex. rel. Chagolla
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Woods et al v. Lyft, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods and Melinda Hotchkins
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and Estate of Romualdo Barrientos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods and Melinda Hotchkins
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods
Defendant:
Melinda Hotchkins and Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00805
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hardison v. Castro et al
as 2:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hardison
Defendant:
Paula Andrea Bedoya Castro and Lyft, Inc. doing business as Lyft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Pineda v. Sabree et al
as 2:2022cv01426
Plaintiff:
Frankie R. Pineda, Michael A. Abenante, Amanda Abenante and others
Defendant:
Neal Hakeen Sabree, Lyft, Inc. and Nicolas Raygoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Halstead v. Wilson et al
as 2:2021cv02152
Plaintiff:
Megan Halstead
Defendant:
Peme Revelo Wilson and Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Muhammad v. Skomsvold et al
as 2:2021cv01536
Plaintiff:
Ameer R Muhammad
Defendant:
James Milton Skomsvold, Hertz Vehicles, LLC and Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
