Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Miller et al v. Barrick Gold et al
as 3:2013cv00370
801) 359-0875 (fax:
Barrick Cortez, Inc.
Defendant:
Barrick Gold and Barrick Goldstrike, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mach 4 Construction LLC and Duncan Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Trustees of the Northern Nevad, et al v. Mach 4 Construction, LLC, et al
as 13-15843
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TRUSTEES OF THE NORTHERN NEVADA OPERATING ENGINEERS HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES-OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS PREAPPRENTICE, APPRENTICE, AND JOURNEYMAN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TRAINING FUND FOR NORTHERN NEVADA, TRUSTEES-OPERATING ENGINEERS PENSION TRUST FUND and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MACH 4 CONSTRUCTION, LLC, DUNCAN MILLER and ANGELA MILLER
Mach 4 Construction, LLC v. Operating Engineers Local No.
as 13-15832
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
MACH 4 CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO. 3
Mach 4 Construction, LLC v. Operating Engineers Local No.
as 13-15820
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
MACH 4 CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO. 3
Mach 4 Construction, LLC v. Operating Engineers Local #3
as 3:2009cv00565
Plaintiff:
Mach 4 Construction, LLC
Defendant:
Operating Engineers Local #3
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Trustees-Northern Nevada Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Mach 4 Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00578
Plaintiff:
Trustees-Northern Nevada Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Trustees-Operating Engineers and Participating Employers Preapprentice, Apprentice, and Journeyman Affirmative Action Training Fund for Northern Nevada, Trustees-Operating Engineers Pension Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Mach 4 Construction, LLC, Duncan Miller and Angela Miller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.