Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mallinckrodt LLC et al v. Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01084
Plaintiff:
Mallinckrodt LLC , Mallinckrodt Inc. and Nuvo Research Inc.
Defendant:
Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co. Inc., Akorn Pharmaceuticals Inc., Akorn Ophthalmics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Mallinckrodt LLC et al v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
as 1:2014cv00389
Plaintiff:
Mallinckrodt LLC , Mallinckrodt Inc. and Nuvo Research Inc.
Defendant:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
IGI Laboratories Inc. v. Mallinckrodt LLC et al
as 1:2013cv02044
Plaintiff:
IGI Laboratories Inc.
Defendant:
Mallinckrodt LLC , Mallinckrodt Inc. and Nuvo Research Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Nuvo Research Inc. , Mallinckrodt LLC and Mallinckrodt Inc.
Counter_defendant:
IGI Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Mallinckrodt LLC et al v. Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 1:2013cv00494
Plaintiff:
Mallinckrodt LLC , Mallinckrodt Inc. and Nuvo Research Inc.
Defendant:
Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Taro Pharmaceutical USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Mallinckrodt LLC et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01087
Plaintiff:
Mallinckrodt LLC , Mallinckrodt Inc. and Nuvo Research Inc.
Defendant:
Apotex Inc., Apotex Corp., Lupin Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
UCB Inc. et al v. Mallinckrodt Inc.
as 1:2012cv00463
Plaintiff:
UCB Inc. and UCB Manufacturing Inc.
Defendant:
Mallinckrodt Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
E-Z-EM, Inc. v. Mallinckrodt Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00287
Defendant:
Mallinckrodt Inc. and Liebel-Flarsheim Company
Plaintiff:
E-Z-EM Inc. and Acist Medical Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mallinckrodt Inc. et al v. E-Z-EM Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00228
Plaintiff:
Mallinckrodt Inc. and Liebel-Flarsheim Company
Defendant:
E-Z-EM Inc. and Acist Medical Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
