Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Banks v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv10136
Plaintiff:
Quilla Maurice Banks
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tarantino v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06297
Plaintiff:
Moose Tarantino and Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jobin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06580
Plaintiff:
Daniel Maurice Jobin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Boone v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06199
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson Boone
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Manning v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01004
Plaintiff:
Demario Maurice Manning
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hill v. Saul
as 1:2019cv07371
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rsReview
Blackman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2019cv03200
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Maurice Blackman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dennis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv00461
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dennis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Walton v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv04306
Plaintiff:
Maurice Walton
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burnette v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv05549
Plaintiff:
Maurice Burnette
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
