Cases 11 - 20 of 398
Ortiz v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02762
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schuemann v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00756
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Garry Schuemann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01330
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Richard McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muzzey v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv01931
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Ruth Muzzey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laguerra v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02754
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Laguerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Siudvinski v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02766
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Siudvinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santo v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01331
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Santo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv14467
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Natalie Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEADE v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv24700
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
TAMMY MEADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Skumanich v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv24699
Defendant:
McKesson Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter Skumanich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
