Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of v. USA
as 11-14825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a Federally recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, et al v. New Hope Sugar Co., et al
as 11-12215
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federally-recognized Indian Tribe and FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES
Defendant - Appellant:
OKEELANTA CORPORATION and NEW HOPE SUGAR COMPANY
:
SERVICE
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. USA
as 10-14762
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federally-recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
USA
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of v. USA, et al
as 10-14271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federally-recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
USA, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY and others
Miccosukee Tribe, et al v. New Hope Sugar Co., et al
as 10-14131
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federally-recognized Indian Tribe and FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES
Intervenor - Appellant:
OKEELANTA CORPORATION and NEW HOPE SUGAR COMPANY
Defendant:
USA, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Warden and STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
State of Florida Department v. Miccosukee Tribes, et al
as 10-12752
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federally-recognized Indian Tribe and FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
:
SERVICE
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. USA, et al
as 10-12379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federally-recognized Indian tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
USA, U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
