Cases 1 - 8 of 8
JENKINS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
ROGER WILLIAMS, PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER, RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
TERRY v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2014cv01112
Plaintiff:
LUE CINDY TERRY
Defendant:
MICHAEL DEWINE, KIMBERLY COCROFT, ZACH SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
BRADLEY v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2014cv00110
Plaintiff:
RALPH J. BRADLEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL DEWINE , CHARLES E. BROWN , KRISTIN G. FARMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STRAUSS et al
as 1:2011cv00880
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. STRAUSS, JOSEPH C. BARREIRO and PATRICK B. STRAUSS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. DE MAY et al
as 1:2010cv00511
Plaintiff:
CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY , MOORE & BRUCE, LLP , JONATHON R. MOORE and others
Defendant:
JAMES MICHAEL DE MAY, ANNE SCHRADER-DE MAY, COUNSELOR TRUST REG. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
LEITNER v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2009cv02342
Plaintiff:
MARK DANIEL LEITNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, ERIC HOLDER, TIFFANY HOPE EGGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
STEPHENS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv01162
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JACK STEPHENS and KELLIE DAWN CLARK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE TAX AND AUDIT SERVICES, INC., GAYLE HODGES and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7429 IRS: Tax Jeopardy Assessment
STEPHENS v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2007cv01059
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JACKSON STEPHENS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, T. E. FENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
