Cases 1 - 7 of 7
In re: FBOP Execution Protocol Cases
as 21-5004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Richard Tipton, Chadrick Evan Fulks, Norris G. Holder, Jr. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Smith, Assistant Director, Health Services Division, Jeffrey Rosen, Acting Attorney General, William E. Wilson, M.D., Clinical Director, U.S. Penitentiary Terre Haute and others
In Re:
In re: In the Matter of the Federal Bureau of Prisons' Execution Protocol Cases
Not Yet Classified:
Bruce Webster, Anthony Battle, Jeffrey Paul and others
Susan Abulhawa, et al v. TREA, et al
as 17-5158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Susan Abulhawa, Michael Several, Avraham Peled, also known as Miko Peled and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of the Treasury
Defendant - Appellant:
Steven T. Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury
Nathan Smith v. Barack Obama
as 16-5377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nathan Michael Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States
SMITH v. OBAMA
as 1:2016cv00843
Defendant:
OBAMA and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Plaintiff:
SMITH and NATHAN MICHAEL SMITH
Amicus Curiae:
MICHAEL J. GLENNON and CONSTITUTION PROJECT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv00697
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and STUART J. ISHIMARU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY COMMISSION et al
as 1:2010cv00703
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY COMMISSION, CLAUDIA KOENIG, HEATHER ASHBURY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. BELL et al
as 1:2007cv00120
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
GARY G. BELL, GARY G. BELL, JOSEPH GRENDYS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
