Cases 1 - 10 of 21
MONK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv24750
Plaintiff:
HENRY L MONK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MONK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17488
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MONK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MONK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05665
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MONK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MONK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv44946
Plaintiff:
TOM MONK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv17149
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROY LEE MONK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv83919
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MONK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv71509
Plaintiff:
DAVID MONK
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv50975
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC MONK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv41485
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MONK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40555
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
COREY ALAN MONK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
