Cases 1 - 10 of 16
ESPER v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2021cv03119
Plaintiff:
MARK T. ESPER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
REARY v. ESPER et al
as 1:2020cv03008
Defendant:
Board for Corrections of Naval Records, KENNETH BRAITHWAITE, MARK T. ESPER and others
Plaintiff:
JARED J. REARY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv02946
Not Classified By Court:
JEFFREY H. WOOD, DONALD J. TRUMP, EDWARD B. CASHMAN and others
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED NAZIR BIN LEP and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHAW v. ESPER et al
as 1:2020cv02036
Defendant:
KENNETH BRAITHWAITE and MARK T. ESPER
Plaintiff:
STEVEN E. SHAW
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
HUBERT et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv01746
Defendant:
JAMES E. MCPHERSON, DR. MARK T. ESPER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES J. HUBERT and JEREMY I. SUNKEL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. ESPER et al
as 1:2020cv01230
Defendant:
CHAD WOLF, MARK T. ESPER and LIEUTENANT GENERAL TODD T. SEMONITE
Plaintiff:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
SAPP v. ESPER et al
as 1:2020cv00935
Defendant:
RYAN D. MCCARTHY, MARK T. ESPER and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW, JASON K SAPP and JASON K. SAPP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
LAKNER v. ESPER
as 1:2019cv00991
Plaintiff:
MD GEORGE S. LAKNER and GEORGE S. LAKNER
Defendant:
MARK T. ESPER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CHAMBERS v. ESPER et al
as 1:2019cv00133
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and MARK T. ESPER
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
BENNETT v. ESPER
as 1:2019cv00131
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Bennett and TIMOTHY M. BENNETT
Defendant:
The Honorable MARK T. ESPER and MARK T. ESPER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
