Cases 1 - 10 of 525
Rogers v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Denise Rogers
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Christina Lousie Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Elliott v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Elliott, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Elliott v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Elliott, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Watkins v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
Will Watkins, III
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gonzales v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Zena Marie Gonzales
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Avila v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Jose N. Avila
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hutchison v. Ethical Capital Partners et al
as 2:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Melissa Hutchison
Defendant:
Ethical Capital Partners, Aylo Premium Ltd., DM Productions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
ZHAO LIQIN
Defendant:
MARTIN JAY MCDANIEL and Walmart, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Zhao v. McDaniel et al
as 2:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Liqin Zhao
Defendant:
Martin Jay McDaniel and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
