Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 177
Jones v. Monzon
as 1:2024cv01192
Plaintiff: Kimberly M. Jones
Defendant: Matthew Monzon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harris et al v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc. et al et al
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff: Jay G. Harris and Norma R. Moreno
Defendant: Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc. et al, Nabors Drilling USA LP, Matthew Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Muth v. Cooke
as 1:2024cv00708
Plaintiff: Matthew Muth
Defendant: James Cooke and James R. Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Safi v. McWhorter et al
as 5:2024cv00233
Plaintiff: Anika Safi
Defendant: Matthew F McWhorter and Raul Salazar doing business as Ras Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Stewart et al v. Air Canada
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff: Matthew Stewart and Megan McKay
Defendant: Air Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Smith v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2024cv00443
Plaintiff: Matthew A Smith
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Johnson v. Crete Carrier et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff: Matthew Johnson
Defendant: Crete Carrier and Anthony Beatty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Bates v. Bliss
as 2:2023cv02571
Plaintiff: Matthew Bates
Defendant: Jennifer Bliss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Righter v. Ballard et al
as 2:2023cv00917
Plaintiff: Jordana Bree Righter
Defendant: Timothy Ballard, Operation Underground Railroad, Inc., Deacon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jack v. Johnson & Johnson
as 1:2023cv02504
Plaintiff: William Matthew Jack
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?