Cases 1 - 10 of 20
TWITTY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05550
Plaintiff:
SHA-MECCA TWITTY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mecca v. Djurasevic et al
as 1:2022cv20197
Plaintiff:
Janet Mecca
Defendant:
Mary Djurasevic and Stanley's Day Avenue, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Petition to Quiet Title
Mecca v. Djurasevic et al
as 1:2022cv20195
Plaintiff:
Janet Mecca
Defendant:
Mary Djurasevic and Stanley's Day Avenue, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Mecca v. Djurasevic et al
as 1:2022cv20196
Plaintiff:
Janet Mecca
Defendant:
Mary Djurasevic and Stanley's Day Avenue, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08851
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MECCA BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MECCA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv48990
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MECCA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MECCA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv48007
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MECCA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCPHERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv13080
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MECCA E. MCPHERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCPHERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv64428
Plaintiff:
MECCA E MCPHERSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mecca v. United States of America
as 8:2019cv01379
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mecca
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
