Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Simplexgrinnell LP v. Mechanical Concepts Inc et al
as 5:2016cv01057
Plaintiff:
Simplexgrinnell LP
Defendant:
Mechanical Concepts Inc and RLI Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Board of Trustees of the Northern Illinois Benefit Fund et al v. Ultimate Mechanical Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01497
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Northern Illinois Benefit Fund , Board of Trustees of the Northern Illinois Pension Fund , Board of Trustees of the Northern Illinois Education Fund and others
Defendant:
Ultimate Mechanical Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Northern Illinois Benefit Fund, the et al v. Ultimate Mechanical Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00598
Defendant:
Ultimate Mechanical Concepts, Inc., Brian Harris and David Barker
Plaintiff:
Northern Illinois Benefit Fund, the, Northern Illinois Benefit Fund, the, Northern Illinois Pension Fund, the and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597 et al v. Ultimate Mechanical Concepts, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv07615
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597, Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597, Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597 and others
Defendant:
Ultimate Mechanical Concepts, Inc., Brian Harris and David Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597 et al v. Mechanical Concepts, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02499
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597, Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597, Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Welfare Fund, Local 597 and others
Defendant:
Mechanical Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
