Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Jihad Adbul-Mumit v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.
as 2:2014cv04367
Plaintiff:
Christopher Legendre, Ben Sullenger, Benjamin Basham
and others
Defendant:
Alexandria Hyunda, LLC, Gateway Hyundai, Inc., Harrisonburg Auto Mall, LLC
and others
Interested Party:
Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, VA
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
Sheila Dekalb et al v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2013cv06308
Plaintiff:
Susan Pileggi, Susan Pellegrino, Elizabeth Patel
and others
Defendant:
Does, C R Bard Inc, Sofradim Production SAS
and others
Fields vs. McKesson Corporation
as 4:2013cv03050
Plaintiff:
Melanie Charles , Stanley Bullard , Mary Ann Waldvogel
and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jim Aana; et al. vs. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
Jim Aana , Marie Aana , Thelma Aana
and others
Defendant:
Doe Defendants 1-10, Gay & Robinson, Inc. , Pioneer Hi-Bred International
and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Allana Boroni et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2011cv07303
Plaintiff:
Barbara Sponster, Rayetta L Stanley, Del Staudinger
and others
Defendant:
State Bar of California, State of California, James M Toma
and others
Joseph et al v. Klamath County, Oregon et al
as 1:2008cv03118
Plaintiff:
Bernice Joseph, Lawrence Joseph, Sr.
Defendant:
Klamath County, Oregon, Melanie Ewell, Daniel Wilson
and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wilson-Combs
as 2:2007at00926
Plaintiff:
Lana Wilson-Combs
Defendant:
California Department of Consumer Affairs, Russ Heimerich, Steve Dakota
and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
