Cases 11 - 20 of 485
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02908
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Zashin et al v. Riddle et al
as 1:2024cv02862
Plaintiff:
Ms Mary McAboy Zashin and Seymur Parviz Mammadli
Defendant:
Kevin Riddle, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Rusanov et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv02830
Plaintiff:
IGOR RUSANOV and MARIA CHORNEY
Defendant:
Aledandro Mayorkas, UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
KARAPYSH et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv02834
Plaintiff:
LILIIA KARAPYSH and IHOR HIRNYK
Defendant:
Aledandro Mayorkas, District Director UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Cristian Torres v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1558
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN NOEL TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francisco Moran Martinez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1520
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO SALVADOR MORAN MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Rivera v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Jhonnattan Tadeo Rivera
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
