Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,250
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00813
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Singh v. Garland
as 24-2686
Petitioner: PARMINDERPAL SINGH
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
State of California, et al. v. United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms & Explosives, et al.
as 24-2701
Plaintiff: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BRYAN MUEHLBERGER, FRANK BLACKWELL and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES, STEVEN DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as Director of ATF, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Villeda-Gonzales v. Garland
as 24-2689
Petitioner: OSCAR MANUEL VILLEDA-GONZALES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Villazana Cuevas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2707
Petitioner: BRENDA KARINA VILLAZANA CUEVAS and LUIS ANGEL GALLEGOS VILLAZANA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mora Alvarez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2698
Petitioner: FRANCISCO MORA ALVAREZ, MARIA MADRIGAL GARIBO, MARIA MORA MADRIGAL and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ayala-Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2699
Petitioner: JESUS ALBERTO AYALA-RODRIGUEZ, INGRID ARELY LAINEZ-DE AYALA, ALEXI ARNOLDO AYALA-LAINEZ and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Santamaria-Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2700
Petitioner: MARTA ALICIA SANTAMARIA-RAMIREZ and ERICK ADOLFO LEIVA-SANTAMARIA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Quinteros-Lainez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2706
Petitioner: MARIA DOLORES QUINTEROS-LAINEZ and MELVIN ESTIBEN MERCADO-QUINTEROS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Duran Marroquin v. Garland
as 24-2711
Petitioner: CARLOS ALBERTO DURAN MARROQUIN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?