Cases 41 - 50 of 485
Stojkova v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv01363
Plaintiff:
Tanja Stojkova
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Director UR M JADDOU, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Cao et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Xingzhi Cao, Zhaorui Jiang, Zijun Jiang and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Pilar Sandoval Reynoso v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1236
Petitioner:
PILAR SANDOVAL REYNOSO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jenic et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv01175
Plaintiff:
Jordan Sara Jenic and Aleksandar Jenic
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
