Cases 1 - 10 of 793
NDAHIRO v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv02541
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Plaintiff:
EVALDE NDAHIRO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02441
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02424
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02409
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NAKID et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv02394
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, CONN SCHRADER and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIELA NAKID FILASKOSKI, MARIA CAROLINA DE CARVALHO NAKID and BIANCA NAKID FILASKOSKI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02327
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MIRZAEI v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv02282
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, MARY ELIZABETH BRENNAN SENG and others
Plaintiff:
RAZIEH MIRZAEI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02276
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
RALLAGE v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv02250
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK B. GARLAND and UR M. JADDOU
Plaintiff:
DINESH D.P. RALLAGE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
