Cases 1 - 9 of 9
FLORES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12936
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MIGUEL FLORES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FLORES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04744
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL FLORES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FLORES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02988
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL FLORES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCAPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLORES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52962
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL FLORES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maria Gonzalez-Alonzo, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 21-13115
Petitioner:
MARIA LETICIA GONZALEZ-ALONZO, NORMAN MIGUEL FLORES-GONZALEZ, JORGE LUIS FLORES-GONZALEZ and others
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
FLORES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv04947
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLORES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv33992
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLORES MUNIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv09243
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO MIGUEL FLORES MUNIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lussi et al v. Design-Build & Engineering, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv23446
Plaintiff:
Marcelo David Lussi, Erick Madel Cruz, Adel Alvarado and others
Defendant:
Design-Build & Engineering, Inc. and Andres Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
