Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jairo Hernandez-Rivas v. U.S. Attorney General
as 21-10186
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
JAIRO MIGUEL HERNANDEZ-RIVAS
James Wolfe, et al v. Carnival Corporation
as 19-14326
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SONIA HERNANDEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, SHIVON HARRIS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CARNIVAL CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, d.b.a. Carnival Cruise Lines
James Wolfe, et al v. Carnival Corporation
as 19-10422
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SONIA HERNANDEZ, MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, SAMAD RAINEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CARNIVAL CORPORATION
In re: Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, et al
as 14-12495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA
Interested Party - Appellant:
BERNARDO ROMAN, III, YINET PINO and YESENIA LARA
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY CYPRESS, DEXTER WAYNE LEHITNEN, GUY A. LEWIS and others
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of v. Billy Cypress, et al
as 13-12665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY CYPRESS, DEXTER WAYNE LEHTINEN, Esquire, GUY ALAN LEWIS and others
USA v. Miguel Hernandez-Abraham
as 13-11932
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ-ABRAHAN, a.k.a. Miguel Hernandez
In re: Hernandez et al
as 1:2012mc23290
Appellant:
Miguel Hernandez and Marcelina Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Hernandez et al
as 1:2012bk00003
Appellant:
Miguel Hernandez and Marcelina Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. Cypress et al
as 1:2012cv22439
Plaintiff:
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida
Defendant:
Billy Cypress, Dexter Wayne Lehtinen, Guy A. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
