Cases 11 - 20 of 273
Iowa Soybean Association, et al v. EPA
as 22-1083
Petitioner:
Iowa Soybean Association, The Minnesota Soybean Growers Association, South Dakota Soybean Association and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al v. EPA
as 22-1084
Petitioner:
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, Domestic Energy Producers Alliance, Energy Marketers of America and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Clean Fuels Development Coalition, et al v. EPA
as 22-1085
Petitioner:
Clean Fuels Development Coalition, ICM, Inc., Illinois Corn Growers Association and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner:
State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified:
ConservAmerica
The Illinois Soybean Association, et al v. EPA
as 22-1033
Petitioner:
The Illinois Soybean Association, Iowa Soybean Association, Indiana Soybean Alliance, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00481
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and STATE OF NEW YORK
Defendant:
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED and CHANGE HEALTHCARE INC.
Petitioner:
ABILITY NETWORKS INC. and AVAILITY, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
Voyageur Outward Bound School, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-5137
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Land Management, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Center for Biological Diversity, 18cv1496, Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness, Hungry Jack Outfitters and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness, 18cv1499
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Twin Metals Minnesota LLC and Franconia Minerals (US) LLC
Voyageur Outward Bound School, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-5139
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Land Management, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness, Hungry Jack Outfitters, Ely Outfitting Company & Boundary Waters Guide Service and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wilderness Society, 18cv1496, Center for Biological Diversity, 18cv1496 and Izaak Walton League of America, 18cv1496
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Twin Metals Minnesota LLC and Franconia Minerals (US) LLC
Voyageur Outward Bound School, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-5138
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Voyageur Outward Bound School, Wenonah Canoe, Inc., Sawbill Canoe Outfitters, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Bureau of Land Management, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Center for Biological Diversity, 18cv1496, Izaak Walton League of America, 18cv1496, Wilderness Society, 18cv1496 and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Twin Metals Minnesota LLC and Franconia Minerals (US) LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
