Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mirage Yacht, Inc. v. A 2013 63 Marquis Yachts recreational vessel
as 1:2024cv21095
Plaintiff:
Mirage Yacht, Inc.
Defendant:
A 2013 Marquis Yachts recreational vessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
SHM LMC, LLC v. A 2001 Model 60-Foot Magnum Marine motor yacht bearing Hull Identification Number US-MAG60001D001, its engines, tackle, furniture, furnishings, and appurtenances, in rem et al
as 0:2023cv60381
Plaintiff:
SHM LMC, LLC d/b/a LAUDERDALE MARINE CENTER
Defendant:
A 2001 Model 60-Foot Magnum Marine motor yacht bearing Hull Identification Number US-MAG60001D001, its engines, tackle, furniture, furnishings, and appurtenances, in rem, Mazyer "Mike" Hatami, Mirage Yacht, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty - Services Rendered
Mirage Yacht, Inc. M/Y 7 DAY WEEKEND
as 1:2022cv21069
Plaintiff:
Mirage Yacht, Inc.
Defendant:
M/Y 7 Day Weekend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Mirage Yacht, Inc. v. M/Y JAMES CAIRD
as 1:2022cv20078
Plaintiff:
Mirage Yacht, Inc.
Defendant:
M/Y JAMES CAIRD, a 2006 39 foot Logos Marine Ltd. recreational vessel and M/Y JAMES CAIRD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Mirage Yacht Inc. v. 2001 "Magnum 60" HIN, MAG60001D001
as 1:2018cv24800
Plaintiff:
Mirage Yacht Inc.
Defendant:
2001 "Magnum 60"', HIN, MAG60001D001
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Hatami et al v. M/V ODDS & ENDS, Hull No. HATGU303B606
as 1:2017cv24313
Plaintiff:
Mayzer Hatami and Mirage Yachts, Inc.
Defendant:
M/V ODDS & ENDS, Hull No. HATGU303B606
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mirage Yacht, Inc. v. The M/V QUANTELL, HIN, DUFC0544C898
as 1:2017cv23206
Plaintiff:
Mirage Yacht, Inc.
Defendant:
The M/V "QUANTELL", HIN, DUFC0544C898
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Tucker et al v. Mirage Yacht Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv21496
Plaintiff:
Shaun Tucker and Joanne Tucker
Defendant:
Mirage Yacht Inc. and Federal Lien Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
