Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Martin et al v. GMAC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00118
Plaintiff:
Pharaoh Orlando Martin and Karen Renee Norton
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage Corporation, GMAC Mortgage LLC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Radford v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 1:2010cv00767
Plaintiff:
Richard Leonard Radford
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank , Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC , Fremont Investment & Loan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Radford v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2010cv00766
Plaintiff:
Richard Leonard Radford
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association , BNC Mortgage, Inc. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Franco v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 1:2010cv00735
Plaintiff:
Jefferson A. Franco
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Kama et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 1:2010cv00681
Plaintiff:
Rupert N. Kama and Diana L. Kama
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Bank of America, N.A., BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
