Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Patsy Sakuma v. Assoc. of Apt. Owners of the Tropics at Waikele, et al
as 22-16929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATSY N. SAKUMA, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE TROPICS AT WAIKELE, an incorporated association, by its board of directors, MILTON M. MOTOOKA, an individual, LOVE, YAMAMOTO & REVERE, LLP, a limited liability law partnership and others
Patsy Sakuma v. Association of Apartment Owner, et al
as 19-16615
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST HAWAIIAN BANK, a Hawaii corporation, ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE TROPICS AT WAIKELE, an incorporated association, by its board of directors, DOES, John Does, 1-5; Jane Does, 1-5; Doe Partnerships, 1-5; Doe Corporations, 1-5; Doe Goverment Units, 1-5 and others
Defendant:
YAMAMOTO & REVERE, LLP, a liability law partnership and LOVE, YAMAMOTO & REVERE, LLP, a limited liability law partnership
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATSY N. SAKUMA
Patsy Sakuma v. Association of Apartment Owner, et al
as 16-16791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATSY N. SAKUMA
Defendant - Appellee:
ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE TROPICS AT WAIKELE, an incorporated association, by its board of directors, MILTON M. MOTOOKA, an individual, LOVE, YAMAMOTO & REVERE, LLP, a limited liability law partnership and others
Sakuma v. AOAO of The Tropics at Waikele et al
as 1:2016cv00274
Plaintiff:
Patsy Naomi Sakuma
Defendant:
Association of Apartment Owners of The Tropics at Waikele, Milton M. Motooka, Porter McGuire Kiakona & Chow, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Baughn et al v. Moulton et al
as 1:2013cv00532
Plaintiff:
Stephen Charles Baughn and Leleaga Savaiinaea Baughn
Defendant:
Todd R. Moulton, Motooka & Yamamoto, Royal Kunia Community Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
