Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mr. Bar-B-Q-,Inc. v. Bristol Holding, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04395
Defendant:
Bristol Holding, Inc., Bristol Holdings USA, Inc. and Julliandistributors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mr. Bar-B-Q-,Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Mr. Bar-B-Q, Inc. v. Natter & Natter et al
as 1:2011cv01258
Plaintiff:
Mr. Bar-B-Q, Inc.
Defendant:
Natter & Natter and Seth Natter, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Mr. Bar-B-Q-, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2009cv04514
Plaintiff:
Mr. Bar-B-Q-, Inc.
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Mr. Bar-B-Q-, Inc. v. Tractor Supply Company
as 1:2009cv03111
Plaintiff:
Mr. Bar-B-Q-, Inc.
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Company and Tractor Supply Company
Counter Claimant:
Tractor Supply Company and Tractor Supply Company
Counter Defendant:
Mr. Bar-B-Q-, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Mr. Bar-B-Q-, Inc. v. Fortune Products, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02194
Plaintiff:
Mr. Bar-B-Q-, Inc.
Defendant:
Fortune Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mr. Bar-B-Q, Inc. v. Jaccard Corporation
as 2:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mr. Bar-B-Q, Inc.
Defendant:
Jaccard Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jaccard Corporation v. Mr. Bar-B-Q, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00297
Plaintiff:
Jaccard Corporation, Jaccard Corporation, Jaccard Corporation and others
Defendant:
Mr. Bar-B-Q, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mr. Bar-B-Q-, Inc. v. M & F International Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv06412
Plaintiff:
Mr. Bar-B-Q-, Inc.
Defendant:
M & F International Inc., 9143-7228 Quebec, Inc. and Menachem Lichter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Mr. Bar-B-Q-, Inc. v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.
as 1:2007cv01496
Plaintiff:
Mr. Bar-B-Q-, Inc.
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
