Cases 1 - 10 of 405
Snyder-Harper v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00981
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Mark Snyder-Harper
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Feliciano v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv08384
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Carmen Feliciano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Correa v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv08244
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Correa
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
George v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv07647
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Barbara George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brazil v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv07041
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
John C Brazil
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas Lorino v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv07055
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lorino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lanza v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv06783
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Richard F Lanza
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Perez v. Berryhill
as 7:2019cv06807
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Perez
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Martinez v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv06515
Plaintiff:
Gregory Martinez
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sampson v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv06270
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Marlon Sampson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
